The People’s Elbow: On a Certain Kind of New Zealand Man

“We knocked the bastard off.”

 

Sir Edmund Hillary had just become the first man to stand on top of Everest. He had done something that had defeated generations of climbers and would immediately enter the realm of history, myth and national symbolism.

 

There were many things he could have said. Something equal to the mountain.

 

Instead, Hillary chose four words that sounded less like a declaration of triumph than a report from someone who had fixed a stubborn gate.

 

There is a New Zealand instinct captured in those words. Not modesty entirely. Modesty suggests a person who understands their significance but chooses not to mention it. This feels different. It is a refusal to participate in the ceremony of one’s own importance. A suspicion that the achievement itself might be enough.

 

Understatement as refusal.

 

I grew up in Australia in the 1980s, in a world where another kind of male confidence was much more familiar.

 

It lived in football clubrooms, on boundary fences and in country pubs. It was in the fathers who took their cues from Dennis Lillee’s stare and Leigh Matthews’ shoulder – men who understood that dominance wasn’t a position you defended. It was a fact you established.

 

That hierarchy had its uses. Those men turned up. They organised, repaired, committed. They understood belonging as something you demonstrated by being present, and that was something you didn’t need to explain either.

 

But it was a particular kind of masculinity. It spoke first. It rarely apologised for taking up room.

 

My dad wasn’t often in that room, and I don’t think it was an accident. He’d watched junior sport in the 80s decide early who belonged and who didn’t, and he wasn’t interested in raising a son inside that sorting. He gave me stories instead – books, film, the arts – and showed me there were other ways of understanding people beyond whichever team you’d been picked for.

 

Perhaps because of that, I became aware of another register.

 

And then, scattered through television, newspapers and borrowed books, there were New Zealanders.

 

They seemed to have wandered in from a different room altogether.

 

John Clarke understood that quality so completely that he turned it into an art form.

 

Fred Dagg was funny not because he was quiet, but because he treated absurdity as something that barely deserved interrupting the day. Clarke understood that the surest way to expose foolishness was often not to attack it, but to calmly describe it.

 

He gave understatement a grammar.

 

Footrot Flats ran on the same principle. Nobody in it seemed interested in becoming remarkable. Triumphs arrived quietly. Disasters were endured. People accepted the strangeness of life without demanding that it explain itself.

 

Between Clarke and Ball, a personality trait became a cultural form.

 

It could be written.

 

Performed.

 

Passed on.

 

By the time Flight of the Conchords arrived, the instinct had become self-aware. Bret McKenzie and Jemaine Clement weren’t simply performing New Zealand understatement, they were examining it. Their characters wanted desperately to matter while remaining almost physically incapable of announcing that desire.

 

The joke had become the reflex itself.

 

I’ve been thinking about all of this because Sam Neill died.

 

Public mourning has a habit of turning people into monuments. The adjectives arrive in formation – great, beloved, generous, irreplaceable. They are usually true. But monuments are strangely poor at resembling the living.

 

Sam Neill always seemed resistant to becoming one.

 

Whether he was discussing films, his vineyard, his dogs or the daily absurdities of self-checkout machines, he carried the unmistakable impression of someone who had never quite accepted that his own importance was the most interesting thing about him.

 

His interviews wander. His stories rarely arrive with a spotlight already shining on them.

 

He spent decades playing kings, scientists, doctors and patriarchs.

 

Off screen, he seemed happiest being Sam.

 

That may be why his death felt unexpectedly personal to so many who had never met him.

 

It wasn’t simply because he was a great actor, although he was. It was because he represented something recognisable. A way of moving through the world lightly. Authority without performance. Intelligence without display.

 

Looking back, I think that was what I’d been responding to all along.

 

Not an escape from the culture I came from, but an expansion of it.

 

Hillary, Clarke, Ball and Neill were not examples of men who rejected their worlds. They were examples of men who carried those worlds differently.

 

They understood that achievement did not require constant announcement. That humour could be generous rather than competitive. That confidence could lower its voice.

 

This isn’t a study. It’s just a list of men I admired, in the order I found them.

 

And there is an obvious complication that belongs here. Deflection reads as confidence when the person doing it already has authority nobody questions. Hillary had already stood on the summit. The understatement worked because no one in the room doubted, for a second, what had actually been achieved.

 

A woman doing the same thing – achieving something remarkable and refusing to make a ceremony of it – is rarely read as quietly confident. She is read as unassuming, or as still finding her feet, or as someone who simply hasn’t yet learned to advocate for herself. The same four words, spoken by a woman who had just done something extraordinary, would very likely be heard as modesty rather than mastery. And modesty, unlike this refusal, is usually taken as an invitation to underestimate someone.

 

Which suggests the trait I’m admiring isn’t simply understatement. It is understatement backed by a certainty, on the part of everyone listening, that grandeur was available and declined. That certainty has not been evenly distributed. It has mostly gathered around men whose achievements were never in doubt to begin with.

 

Those contradictions are real, but they don’t erase the thing being admired.

 

I still understand the language of the clubroom. I still love the stories, the rituals and the people who created that world for me.

 

But somewhere along the way, I was drawn to another possibility.

 

A quieter one.

 

A man could be accomplished without advertising it.

 

A person could be interesting without insisting upon being noticed.

 

Which brings me back to Hillary.

 

“We knocked the bastard off.”

 

For years I thought it was simply the perfect thing to say after climbing Everest.

 

Now I think it was something more.

 

It was the first sentence in a story about a particular way of being in the world.

 

A way that a young Australian boy recognised before he had the words to explain why.

 

 

 

More from The People’s Elbow can be read HERE.

 

 

 

To return to the www.footyalmanac.com.au  home page click HERE

 

Our writers are independent contributors. The opinions expressed in their articles are their own. They are not the views, nor do they reflect the views, of Malarkey Publications.

 

Do you enjoy the Almanac concept?
And want to ensure it continues in its current form, and better? To help keep things ticking over please consider making your own contribution.

 

Become an Almanac (annual) member – CLICK HERE