The Ashes 2021/22 – Third Test, Melbourne Day 2: When you have to be grateful for second best

WHEN YOU HAVE TO BE GRATEFUL FOR SECOND BEST

 

A THING of beauty, it wasn’t – far from it. And satisfied by it, he certainly wouldn’t be.

 

But Marcus Harris will find plenty of positives about the 76 he cobbled together against England at the MCG on Monday, the most obvious of which is that it has pulled his stuttering Test career back from the brink of oblivion.

 

That’s the personal perspective.

 

Of broader importance, perhaps, is that without it Australia would have struggled to catch England’s mediocre offering of 185 which they finally did midway through the second afternoon with all five specialist batsmen – and the nightwatchman – back in the shed, Cameron Green having now been widely identified as a bowling all-rounder.

 

The best way to measure the value of Harris’s contribution is that it was more than all the big guns, David Warner (38), Marnus Labuschagne (1), Steve Smith (16) and Travis Head (27) were able to assemble between them against the best English bowling of the series so far.

 

When you look at it that way, it was priceless – and might yet be looked back on as a crucial component of the Ashes defence.

 

As they say, cometh the hour, cometh the man.

 

There was a real and unsurprising sense that the 40,000-strong MCG crowd—the native West Australian’s adopted home crowd —  were willing him to make a hundred for the first time in his 13 Test career, his previous highest being 79 against India in Sydney nearly two years ago, one of only two previous half centuries.

 

In four previous innings in this series he had managed a total of only 38 and a statistical flagging as one of the most poorly performed opening batsmen ever among those who had been givn a reasonable crack at it, as he has.

 

More of the same today would likely have spelled the end, given he is 29, and despite the undertaking by chairman of selectors George Bailey to give him every chance to prove himself.

 

That might have been the case when he was given out lbw to Ben stokes 36, only to be reprieved by the third umpire. He was also let of on 63 when wicketkeeper Josh Buttler’s unagile footwork saw a clear stumping chance off spinner Jack Leach go begging.

 

There were plenty of other uncertain, unconvincing moments but in the end he occupied the crease for 189 balls across three sessions, shrugging off a bloodied finger the night before, before nicking  James Anderson into the slips.

 

It wasn’t quite job done – not by a margin – but it deserved the applause it got.

 

England, as belated as it was, finally enjoyed a day they could be proud of, thanks to Anderson and Mark Wood.

 

Anderson also disposed of Warner, Smith and Cummings to finish with 4/33off 23 overs at an economy rate of 1.43 and no wides or no-balls — immaculate, in a word. One six-over spell going for one run (a dropped catch) and claiming the massive wicket of Smith.

 

It was England’s first bag of more than three wickets for the series, when it really deserved to have been his 32nd career five-for and second in Australia.

 

It was the sort of elite performance that his status as the most experienced and successful pace bowler in history suggested was always likely to unfold eventually, especially on the most bowler-friendly MCG pitch in recent memory.

 

Wood’s tireless fierce pace also kept the pressure rating high, while Ollie Robinson picked up a couple of handy scalps without quite shutting down speculation that on this surface he really should have made way for Anderson’s old partner and foil, Stuart Broad.

 

It brought the match alive and restored a pulse to the tourists’ hitherto forlorn hopes of coming back from two-nil down, a feat not achieved since Don Bradman’s troops did it the best part of 100 years ago.

 

It helped that the catches were taken, three of them by under-siege skipper Jack Root at first slip, who was once again coming under plenty of fire in commentary boxes and on social media for failing to turn the screws aggressively enough when he had the Australians with their backs to the wall pretty much for the first time.

 

With three days to go, could England possibly pull this match back out of the fire and keep the series alive?

 

Well, with Australia leading by a handy 82 it’s unlikely but if Harris can turn his feeble form into a forcible fightback, there is theoretically no reason why they can’t do the same – and set the hosts a challenging chase on the fourth or fifth day.

 

Much stranger things have happened.

 

 

Read more from Ron Reed Here.

 

To return to the www.footyalmanac.com.au  home page click HERE

 

Our writers are independent contributors. The opinions expressed in their articles are their own. They are not the views, nor do they reflect the views, of Malarkey Publications.

 

Do you enjoy the Almanac concept?
And want to ensure it continues in its current form, and better? To help keep things ticking over please consider making your own contribution.

 

Become an Almanac (annual) member – CLICK HERE
One-off financial contribution – CLICK HERE
Regular financial contribution (monthly EFT) – CLICK HERE

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Apparently written before the last hour, unfortunately. Would have loved to read your thought on that, Ron. That hour reminded me of some late sessions involving the great Lillee and Thommo, especially at Adelaide Oval one year. Pity the crowd was relatively small, but it was a good session, even if against modest opposition. Love it when Test players lift the bat, refuse to dignify a delivery with a shot, get bowled. Although, calling Jack Leach a Test player may be a bit fast and loose with the truth. Root and Stokes, once again, the only hope for the Poms. Take no prisoners, OZ.

  2. Correct, of course, Bucko. I added this update to my Facebook page rorwhat it’snworth

    I really should know by now never to file before the fat lady sings. Nothing in the previous post is wrong – except that it’s no longer game on, as my old column used to be called. The game – and the adhes – will be done and dusted tomorrow, possibly by tea – or even lunch! That opening few overs from starc and cummins tonight was as intense as i can recall at the G, not super fast or physically frightening like the old windies or lillee/ thommo but just mentally intimidating for batsmen who are now utterly unnerved – at least in hameed’s case. This is a huge triumph for pat cummins especially and an absolute embarrassment for the Poms. or have i gone too early again? Don’t think so.

  3. Daryl Schramm says

    Where Leach was standing allowing all three stumps to be seen it seemed inevitable a misjudgement would occur. Anderson’s effort and performance was, indeed, superb.

  4. Daryl Schramm says

    I just read Jonathan Liew’s article (Gardian). I thought it was worth a share. Sorry, I have no link.

  5. Ron as I wrote on CB article far from convinced on Harris trigger movement there are times he is still on the move so head is moving and is not really,WATCHING the ball but had to admire his fighting spirit
    Interesting to say the least !

    Lowest first innings lead for a team to win by an innings:
    46 – ENG (246) vs NZ (200 & 26) in 1955, Auckland
    74 – WI (392) vs ENG (318 & 51) in 2009, Kingston
    82 – AUS (267) vs ENG (185 & 68) in 2021, Melbourne
    87 – WI (218) vs PAK (131 & 77) in 1986, Lahore

Leave a Comment

*