Australia’s All-Rounder Obsession: The alternative options

Australia is on the search for yet another star all-rounder, or at least that is what the recent selection of Hilton Cartwright to bat at 6 suggests. However, despite a solid debut, Cartwright’s selection has left fans confused about Cricket Australia’s obsession with selecting an all-rounder to fill the batting order. Cartwright became the 6th all-rounder to debut for Australia in the last 4 years (7 if Agar is included) with Shane Watson a regular in the side, despite constant speculation of his worth, during this time. Having tried so many without any desired success the question must now be asked: should Australia give up on its quest for a star all-rounder?


Although Cartwright’s performance on debut with the bat was sound, a mere 4 overs across 2 innings does not bode well for his long-term future in the side as an all-rounder. Should his batting begin to fail him the Australian selectors should look to add a specialist into the side. This could be a batsman to shore up the order or a 5th bowler to add to the attack. Here are the players who should be considered for the position. (With Jackson Bird and Stephen O’Keefe already battling for a spot in the side they have been excluded from the list).


Image result for Australia vs Pakistan 3rd test 2017

Australia celebrate a sweep of Pakistan. Image: Getty Images



The addition of a specialist batsman to the side provides a security the test team has lacked in recent years. Given Australia’s tendency to fall victim to batting collapses, here are 5 batsman who could potentially solidify the lineup coming in at 6.


George Bailey

Bailey has had a tough time on the international circuit of late, however, his Sheffield Shield form has been sensational. Averaging above 60 for the Shield season and having experience around the Australian side, Bailey could be the mature head needed to help guide the young batsman beginning their time in the side.


Joe Burns

Burns is young but also experienced in the Test arena and while preferring to be an opener he has batted down the order for Australia before. Despite being in a form slump lately, Burns averages almost 40 in Test cricket and is a proven performer at the top level. He also fits the age demographic of the current Test side.


Image result for Joe Burns

Burns celebrates his first Test century. Image: Getty Images


Travis Head

Perhaps one of the brightest young cricketers in the country it is a mystery to most how Head is still yet to make his Test debut. Despite an average in the mid 30’s Head is in form and capable of making big scores. Alongside his batting talent, he is also a very handy part time spinner and has recently worked his way into the side for the shorter forms of the game giving him international experience to support his claim.


Chris Lynn

Despite making a name for himself in the Big Bash, Lynn has an outstanding record in Shield cricket as well which often goes unrecognised. Averaging a touch under 45 in his first-class career he is a proven performer in the longest form of the game and is capable to playing the role of a late order hitter should the situation arise. With one of the best Shield records in the country his performance speaks for itself.


Ashton Turner

Turner has burst onto the Shield scene in 2016 scoring 429 runs at an average of above 70. The bright young talent has scored 2 centuries in his 4 matches bringing his first class average up close to 40. Ashton’s hopes of making the team rely on him continuing his form through this season and perhaps even into next.


Image result for Ashton Turner

Turner raises the bat after a another century for Western Australia. Image: Cricket Australia




Given Australia’s desire for the wicket keeper to also be a specialist batsman, it is not necessarily out of the question to move the keeper up to 6 and include an extra bowler into the Test XI. This selection option has even more merit, given the strengthened batting order since the inclusions of Renshaw and Hanscomb. Here are the 5 bowlers that Australia could consider to replace Cartwright.


Pat Cummins

Cummins return from injury has been slow and stunted, but his form in the Big Bash has excited fans across the country. Cummins has pace and an ability to take critical wickets. Having proven he can play at that level in his one Test and shown significant improvement with the bat, a Cummins inclusion could be a good one for both the bat and ball.


Image result for Pat Cummins

Cummins takes a wicket for Australia. Image: Getty Images


James Pattinson

Despite being out of form since his return from injury, there is no doubt that Pattinson is one of the most dangerous bowlers in world cricket. A genuine wicket taker with pace and a strong Test record behind him when Pattinson is switched on there isn’t a batsman in the world who would want to face him.


Chadd Sayers

Sayers was on the verge of making his debut for Australia this summer through consistent strong performances but was pipped for a spot on each occasion. Able to swing the ball a long way and slow down the run rate, Sayers bowling style would perfectly complement the control of Hazlewood and erratic nature of Starc in the Test arena. The leading wicket taker in Shield cricket, Sayers is in fantastic form that would surely be carried into the Test arena.


Mitchell Swepson

Swepson is a mostly unknown young spinner with an ability to take wickets without going for too many runs. Although largely inexperienced he has maintained a solid average of 32 in his 14 matches. His legspin bowling will compliment Nathan Lyon’s offspin and provides captain Steve Smith with multiple different options to mix up the attack and unsettle the batsman.

Image result for Mitchell Swepson

Swepson bowling against Tasmania. Image: Getty Images


 Chris Tremain

Tremain is another player who has performed strongly in the current Shield season to push for selection. Although not commonly talked about as a potential Test player, Tremain has bowled himself to 27 wickets in the shield season (second in the competition) at an average of 17.5. With form on his side, his slower pace could disrupt opposition batsman from the lightning pace of the rest of Australia’s attack.


  1. Citrus Bob says

    Scana – some great observations!
    You only have to look at today’s one-day team to realise how the PTB (powers that be) are so obsessed with all-rounders e.g. Head,Maxwell, M.Marsh, Faulkner, Cummins but where is Cartwright?
    Maxwell will have now gone to the top of the list particularly amongst the Press from Victoria after his form today.
    I have no idea what they are thinking , does anyone?

  2. Thanks Bob, we definitely have a lot of game changing all rounders but selectors seem to make the mistake of assuming ODI form translates to test form.
    Not sure why we need an all rounder if they don’t bat well or bowl at all when you can get a specialist in but I guess that’s why I’m not a selector.
    Maxwell and faulkner have shot themselves up the pecking order but I don’t expect to see either in the test team anytime soon!

  3. Thanks, Scana. Good write-up.

    Hilton Cartwright will not play another Test match. What a disgraceful selection. Smith showed the selectors what he thought of Cartwright’s selection by bowling him for only 4 overs. And in the Big Bash this week, he didn’t even get a bowl for the Perth Heat. Some all-rounder!!

    Anyone who knows anything about cricket knows that Glenn Maxwell is NOT an all-rounder. He is a batsman who rolls his arm over. Travis Head is a much better option as a batsman who can also bowl a little.

  4. Dave Brown says

    Yep, with Smokie,. Head if clearly preferred as a bowler to Maxwell and has put heaps of work into his bowling over the last 12 months. He was spinning the ball further than any of the Pakistanis last night. If he can shore up his batting against spinners (which no doubt he is also working heaps on), he is the perfect fit as a batting all rounder for 6.

  5. Cartwright is a batsman who bowls a little bit ( enjoyed the article but in general tho )

  6. The main issue is Maxwell, Watson and Marsh didn’t bowl enough to warrant all rounder status and there have been better performed batsman in the country. Faulkner, Henriques and Agar didn’t add much with the bat and there were better performed bowlers in the country so the all rounders were only adding one aspect of the game which they weren’t excelling at enough to keep their spot. Just as you said smokie about Maxwell, all the all rounders have had that issue and as Rulebook said Cartwright just bowls a little which means he has to excel with the bat and he hansn’t

    Head I think is the favourite for a spot at 6 because of what Dave said, he’s been putting the work into his bowling and his batting is almost enough to get him to that standard. He could be a reliable bat at 6 who can provide a handy part time option which would be perfect in India alongside Lyon and part timer Smith.

  7. They could just apologise and ask Watto to come back. In form with bat and ball. Younger than Voges by some years.

  8. I do wonder how Mitchell Marsh keeps getting selected. Does he have photos of the selectors in compromising positions ?

    Again he is injured, following a first ball duck batting number 4. You really wonder if his batting is greatly overrated. Maybe play him as a bowler, and like Mitchell Starc, the runs he makes, slogging, should be appreciated.

    Why isn’t Travis Head going to India? We have a squad with chaps like M Marsh, Maxwell and Agar, that could not command a test berth on account of their batting or bowling, which should be the criteria for an all rounder. Isn’t it better to pick a specialist batsmen who can bowl? I know we’ve covered this over and over of recent times but i’d prefer a Dougie Walters or a Keith Stackpole, who is a specialist batsmen but can roll the arm over, taking wickets than a Clayton’s all rounder who is not particularly good at either attribute.


  9. crankypete says

    i think we should start looking for a Sobers Greig Miller, who can bowl both seam and usable spin. That would hive us more of what we need for a tour like this.

  10. Henriques was the interesting one. Had oodles of talent when young. Wasn’t picked. Finally got the nod when Hussey left and Watson wasn’t bowling. Batted the house down on debut in India. Then had a few failures and didn’t get wickets, like everyone else. So didn’t even get into the squad for England.

    Disappeared down the pecking order. Lost form. Plucked from nowhere for a nightmare tour of Sri Lanka. Failed. Gone.

    Bats 6 properly and can skipper and is a decent 4th seamer. Better bat than Mitch Marsh.

    Crucified, like so many.

Leave a Comment