Almanac Cricket: Second Test – Woke up call for India?

 

 

 

 

One day I’ll get to an Adelaide Test.

 

This year’s viewing started in the admissions waiting room at a hospital, on Kayo, on the phone. Saw the first ball, the first wicket and settled in. Soon I was in a bed in a holding room for tagging and shaving and other preparation. There was a TV up high at the end of the bed showing an ABC TV News story about someone who’d died in hospital. Later I noticed an orderly checking out something on a TV at another bed. “Can you put mine onto the cricket please?” I asked. Gill was batting confidently, Rahul looked secure. Then things happened. “Four down,” I said when the orderly reappeared.

 

Wheeled off to another room. No TV. Then to the operating theatre where I noticed the cricket on a laptop. The anaesthetist started doing his thing. “Can you feed through some cricket scores during the operation?” Don’t know if he answered.

 

Finally to a shared room, plugged into various machines, I got hold of my phone and checked the score. The Australians had avoided pink ball nighttime carnage. I glanced at my roommate’s TV – an ABC News banner told us ‘Second Test: Australia trail’… I’d been under a general but could’ve done better than that… ‘Australia on top’ perhaps.

 

Back home for day two. A lot seemed to have happened. To me and in the cricket. I felt like I’d been whacked in the guts by a Mitchell Starc in-swinger. Rest ahead and a few days cricket would help.

 

Bumrah got McSweeny early. Ominous but the newcomer had done alright. Marnus did his job. Ashwin got Marsh so confused that he went home. And somehow through it all Travis Head scored 140.

 

There’s so much firepower in the Indian batting line-up there was still a chance the game could progress and get close. But Cummins, Starc and Boland performed with too much consistency and hostility. It was a reminder that hostile, nasty, uncomfortable bowling doesn’t have to come with abuse and send-offs. Outrageous batting by Pant brought the day to a satisfying end.

 

By the time I got to the TV on day three Pant’s resistance was down. I didn’t feel the need to go to social media after this game, just to bed. But, I wonder, was the consensus that the Indians were too woke? Too nice?

 

 

More from Les Everett can be read Here.

 

 

To return to the www.footyalmanac.com.au  home page click HERE

 

Our writers are independent contributors. The opinions expressed in their articles are their own. They are not the views, nor do they reflect the views, of Malarkey Publications.

 

Do you enjoy the Almanac concept?
And want to ensure it continues in its current form, and better? To help keep things ticking over please consider making your own contribution.

 

Become an Almanac (annual) member – CLICK HERE

 

 

 

 

About Les Everett

A Footy Almanac veteran, Les Everett is the author of Gravel Rash: 100 Years of Goldfields Football and Fremantle Dockers: An Illustrated History. Co-founder with Vin Maskell of scoreboardpressure.com. Founder of australianrules.com.au and the Instagram page https://www.instagram.com/abandonedcricketpitches/

Comments

  1. Malcolm Rulebook Ashwood says

    Hey Les all the best ! India to many shots not enough application the highlight for mine was Nathan McSweeney and Marnus fight on the 1st night which set the game up for Travis.Pant has huge batting ability but no thanks re batting like that and he wouldn’t keep for Kelvinator 3rds.Cummins rhythm improved in each spell

  2. Great analysis of the second Test! It’s always fascinating to see how teams adapt in such competitive conditions. For more insights on cricket, especially focusing on the IPL 2025, head over to IPL2025.in for all the latest news, match previews, and expert opinions. Definitely worth a visit

Leave a Comment

*